Analyzing the Effects of Twitter on Electronic Media A Study of By-Elections 2022 in Pakistan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63067/rbrr2170Ключевые слова:
Twitter, Cable channels, Inter-media agenda setting, Maryam Nawaz, Imran KhanАннотация
This research examines the impact of Twitter on electronic media in Pakistan during the by-elections of 2022. The study specifically focuses on the strategies utilized by political personalities, such as Imran Khan and Maryam Nawaz, to shape public conversation. Twitter, a highly influential social media tool, exerts significant influence in shaping public opinion and setting the agenda. This study uses agenda-setting theory to examine the impact of Twitter debates during the by-elections on the public's perception of prominent themes. This study explores eleven main themes, which include political issues and socio-economic factors. These themes contain topics such as "Lifafa Journalism," "Imported Government," "Lawlessness," and "Inflation." This study conducts a thorough examination of Twitter engagement, uncovering discrepancies in the frequency of tweets and accompanying media coverage received by Imran Khan and Maryam Nawaz on four prominent news networks. It is worth mentioning that Maryam Nawaz's tweets have a notable prevalence, particularly about topics such as "Harsh Language" and "Incompetent Government." On the other hand, Imran Khan's influence is evident in thematic domains such as "Imported Government," "Inflation," "Regime Change," and "Haqeeqi Azadi." The analysis of media coverage reveals that Imran Khan's tweets garnered significant visibility across many thematic categories, particularly on prominent news channels like as ARY News, Geo News, Sama News, and Dunya News. In contrast, the tweets of Maryam Nawaz received considerable attention, namely from Geo News and Dunya News, illustrating the varied media strategies utilized by each leader.
References
Enli, G. S., & Skogerbø, E. (2013). PERSONALIZED CAMPAIGNS IN PARTY-CENTRED POLITICS: Twitter and Facebook as arenas for political communication. Information Communication and Society, 16(5), 757–774. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.782330
Entman, R. M. (2007). Framing bias: Media in the distribution of power. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00336.x
Entman, R. M. (2007). Framing bias: Media in the distribution of power. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00336.x
Farhi, P. (2009). The Twitter explosion: Whether they are reporting about it, finding sources on it or urging viewers, listeners and readers to follow them on it, journalists just can't seem to getenough of the social networking service. Just how effective is it as a journalism tool?. American journalism review, 31(3), 26-32.
Franz, M. M., & Ridout, T. N. (2007). Does political advertising persuade?. Political Behavior, 29, 465-491.
González-Bailón, S., Wang, N., Rivero, A., Borge-Holthoefer, J., & Moreno, Y. (2014). Assessing the bias in samples of large online networks. Social Networks, 38(1), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2014.01.004
Graham, T., Broersma, M., Hazelhoff, K., & Van't Haar, G. (2013). Between broadcasting political messages and interacting with voters: The use of Twitter during the 2010 UK general election campaign. Information, communication & society, 16(5), 692-716.
Hussain, S., Shahzad, F., & Hussain, M. (2020). Agenda-Building Function of Twitter: Exploring Rehashing of Political Tweets in News Channels of Pakistan. Global Mass Communication Studies Review, 3, 109-123.
Lefky, T., Brewer, P. R., & Habegger, M. (2015). Tweets on television news: The nature and effects of campaign coverage of Twitter. Electronic News, 9(4), 257-269.
McCombs and Shaw POQ 1972. (n.d.).
McCombs, M. E. (1093). Jones Centennial Chair in Communication in the Department of Journalism at the University of Texas at Austin. Donald L. Shaw, a Senior Fellow for 1992-93 Copyright 0 1093. In Journal of Communication (Vol. 43, Issue 2).
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972a). American Association for Public Opinion Research The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media. In Source: The Public Opinion Quarterly (Vol. 36, Issue 2).
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972b). American Association for Public Opinion Research The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media. In Source: The Public Opinion Quarterly (Vol. 36, Issue 2).
Meraz, S. (2009a). Is there an elite hold? traditional media to social media agenda setting influence in blog networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(3), 682–707. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01458.x
Melek, G. (2017). A Study on Hürriyet and Twitter Within the Framework of Intermedia Agenda-Setting. Journal of Communication Theory & Research/Iletisim Kuram ve Arastirma Dergisi, 2016(44).
Pennycook, G., Bear, A., Collins, E. T., & Rand, D. G. (2020). The implied truth effect: Attaching warnings to a subset of fake news headlines increases perceived accuracy of headlines without warnings. Management Science, 66(11), 4944–4957. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3478
Qaisar, A. R. (2021). Inter-Media Agenda Setting between Twitter and News-Websites: A Case Study of The Turkish President’s Visit to Pakistan. Connecticut: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, (61), 187-211.
Schillemans, T. (2014). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. In Public Administration (Vol. 92, Issue 4, pp. 1110–1112). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12108
Shehzad, H., Raza, M. R., & Zahra, S. (2019). Licensed to Learn: A Case of TV and Radio Channels in Pakistani Universities. International Journal of Distance Education and E-Learning, 5(1), 57-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36261/ijdeel.v5i1.793.
Su, Y., & Borah, P. (2019). Who is the agenda setter? Examining the intermedia agenda-setting effect between Twitter and newspapers. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 16(3), 236–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2019.1641451
Su, Y., & Borah, P. (2019). Who is the agenda setter? Examining the intermedia agenda-setting effect between Twitter and newspapers. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 16(3), 236-249.
Sweetser, K. D., Golan, G. J., & Wanta, W. (2008). Intermedia agenda setting in television, advertising, and blogs during the 2004 election. Mass Communication & Society, 11(2), 197-216.
Vliegenthart, R., & Walgrave, S. (2008). The contingency of intermedia agenda setting: A longitudinal study in Belgium. Journalism & mass communication quarterly, 85(4), 860-877.
Vaccari, C., Valeriani, A., Barberá, P., Bonneau, R., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J., & Tucker, J. A. (2015). Political expression and action on social media: Exploring the relationship between lower- and higher-threshold political activities among Twitter users in Italy. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(2), 221–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12108
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (n.d.). The spread of true and false news online. http://science.sciencemag.org/
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2023 Abdul Manan Naseer
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution-NonCommercial» («Атрибуция — Некоммерческое использование») 4.0 Всемирная.